Chairman Smith announced that this meeting was being held in compliance
with the provisions of the Open Public Meetings Act, Public Laws 1975,
Chapter 231. It had been properly noticed and posted to the public.
Chairman Smith noted for the record that he reviewed the tapes of the
February 15, 2005 meeting. Mr. Smith was absent for that meeting. He wished
to let everyone know that he was well aware of what was said at that meeting.
Mr. Corrigan, who was also absent for that meeting, indicated that he
had reviewed the tapes as well.
MUNICIPAL STORMWATER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Engineer Tom Nutelski, of Harold Pellow and Associates, was present at
the meeting to informally introduce the Wantage Township Stormwater Management
Plan, which he helped prepare. This plan is a new guidance document for
the implementation of the new stormwater management regulations which
were adopted by NJDEP in February 2004. These new stormwater regulations
are a different way for all developers to look at how to handle stormwater
management on their sites. He indicated that this plan hopes to eliminate
pollution caused by stormwaters. He asked of the Board to:
take time to read the report and offer any comments, suggestions
or concerns,
be placed on agenda for next available Board meeting to allow the
public to discuss the plan, and
at public forum should there not be any fatal flaws to adopt plan
to send to Sussex County for review and approval
He does not anticipate it being denied since it complies with the NJDEP
regulations already in place.
Chairman Smith cautioned the Board about this issue since it is not only
the contractor’s responsibility or the applicant’s responsibility
to monitor the disposal of stormwaters. The homeowner has some responsibility
to make sure that any facility or catch basin on his or her properly is
maintained properly.
L-35-2003 KEVIN KENT
The Applicant has revised his plans for Block 151, Lot 24.02 on Route
519. He is proposing to remove the existing trailers and replace it with
a single family (Cape Cod style residence).
Reference was made to Mr. Harold Pellow’s report dated 2/1/05 reviewed
at the last meeting. The only item pending was a set back issue. A porch
was slightly ahead of the corner of the house. Mr. Kent indicated that
according to the revised plans everything that is proposed is actually
now further set back
.
Attorney Gonzalez reviewed the terms of the application, the proposed
improvement, the items on Mr. Pellow’s report, the plans prepared
by Mr. Eric Smart.
There was no one from the public on this application. Open to the Board.
There were no questions or comments from the Board.
Motion was made by Mr. Bono and seconded by Mr. Slate, to approve the
terms of Mr. Pellow’s report and the variance requested.
ROLL CALL VOTE
THOSE IN FAVOR: Slate, Space, DeBoer, Corrigan, Cecchini, Bono, Hough.
THOSE OPPOSED: None. MOTION CARRIED.
FARMLAND PRESERVATION
Chairman Smith made reference to his conversation with Donna Traylor who
is involved in farmland preservation for the county. Donna had entered
into a number of contracts for people who put their land on farmland preservation
and at the time subdivided a piece of property for future building. In
most cases, it is a 2-acre piece of property. In their discussion with
Donna, it was not their intent to penalize the person who put the farmland
in preservation and at that time set aside a piece of property. Later
our ordinance changed to the 5-acre regulation. Mr. Smith believes that
if the agreement was signed prior to the master plan change then the Board
should recognize that adjustment.
Mr. Tom Morris was scheduled for a discussion on this issue at this meeting.
Mr. Morris was not present at the meeting. However, he is proposing to
subdivide a 2-acre lot noted as a residential exclusion on a farmland
preserved tract on Quarry Road.
Mr. Smith asked Ms. Kanapinski to contact Mr. Morris and let him know
that the 2-acre subdivision is not an issue.
L-52-2002 FORUM HOMES
This application is being reheard by the Board on the basis of a remand
ordered by the court. The property is located on Old Clove Road off Newman
Road and is known as Block 113, Lot 11.01 and Block 114, Lot 3.
Attorney William Strasser of Strasser and Associates of Paramus, New Jersey,
and Mr. George Gloede, the Engineer for this project, were present for
this application.
Attorney Gonzalez made a brief summary of this application. He indicated
that this matter was heard at the February 15, 2005 meeting. It was opened
up to the public, after significant testimony and discussion, the matter
was carried so the Applicant’s engineer and our professional staff
could work out some improvements for the intersection of Newman Road and
Old Clove Road. He also indicated that revised plans on the subject have
not been presented by the Applicant.
Mr. Gonzalez made reference to a letter from George Mr. Papp, Superintendent
of Sussex-Wantage Regional Schools, dated March 15, 2005 regarding the
ability of the buses to get up and down the hill. After an inspection
of the intersection of Newman Road and Old Clove Road, Mr. Papp did not
recommend to the Board of Education placing a bus on that road based on
the following findings:
1) the inability of the bus, even when empty, to exit the intersection
without the tail pipe scraping the road,
2) the width of the road being less than the needed 33 ft,
3) no sufficient turn around,
4) unsafe area for students to wait for the bus.
Mr. Gonzalez indicated that the Applicant was willing to install sidewalks.
However, those plans have not been made available for the Board to review.
The attorney for the Applicant indicated that the plan for sidewalks will
be ready by Friday so they can have this matter expedited.
Chairman Smith does not believe sidewalks can be put on that steep hill.
He questions the congregation of students at the bottom of that hill.
He expressed his concern about the sidewalk cleaning issue and the steepness
of the road. He believes it is very unsafe for kids to travel on a steep
hill. He believes that the Applicant’s engineer is going to have
to address that roadway in a different format.
Mr. Smith made reference to Mr. Harold Pellow’s report dated 2/9/05
- revised
Item 8 on road trust fund – question on whether or not
the funds could be allocated towards the maintenance of that road. It
was never the intent of that road trust fund. The contribution is to address
the impact of the overall development in Wantage Township.
Item 12 off site improvements – will be discussed at a later time.
There are other items on Mr. Pellow’s report which need to be addressed
pending the outcome of the revised plans.
A walk through the property was scheduled for April 12th at 5:00 p.m.
at the site for staking. Rain date April 13th.
Mr. Smith made an announcement that the public is allowed to be present
at the site walk. However, they are not allowed to ask any questions nor
make any comments or suggestions to any of the members of the Board because
they cannot be unduly influenced or pressured. Mr. Gonzalez addressed the
public and stated that if they see something they can bring it up at the
April 26 meeting if it pertains to the sidewalk issue being the only issue
that will be brought up at the meeting.
The Attorney for the Applicant stated that they need waivers for anyone
from the public who is interested in attending the site walk. It was announced
that anyone wishing to attend must contact Joanne for a waiver prior to
the walk.
A motion was made by Mr. Slate and seconded by Mr. Cecchini, to carry this
application to the April 26 meeting. The applicant was in agreement.
ROLL CALL VOTE
THOSE IN FAVOR: Smith, Slate, Space, DeBoer, Corrigan, Cecchini, Bono,
Hough, Kanapinski.
THOSE OPPOSED: None. MOTION CARRIED.
The members of the public present at the meeting inquired about being able
to speak at this meeting. Mr. Smith and Attorney Gonzalez explained that
they were not allowed to hear anyone from the public on this application
at today’s meeting since there were no discussions about the pending
sidewalk issue being that there no sidewalk or roadway plans available from
the Applicant. They were instructed that they would be allowed to speak
at the April 26 meeting when the pending sidewalk issue is discussed with
the Applicant.
MAGGIO AND MCEWAN
Mr. Gonzalez gave the Board a brief summary of these two applications
and the reason why they were remanded back to the Board. Following the
Board’s meeting on January 25th 2005 and review of the Maggio application,
a February 1, 2005 hearing on the McEwan portion of this application took
place. There was a question whether 1-acre or 5-acre applied to the McEwan
piece. Judge Bazzanellas ruled that because the resolution tied the McEwan
piece to the resolution of the Maggio subdivision he was going to remand
back both applications for determination as to whether 5-acre zoning applies
to each of the parcels. Both applications will be reheard and a decision
will have to be made.
On a motion duly made and seconded, the Board took a break.
OTHER BUSINESS
NEW ORDINANCES
Mr. Smith noted for the Board the proposed amendments to our ordinance:
Height requirements on accessory buildings.
Minor site plan – allows businesses to make an addition if
needed i.e. for a refrigerator.
Mother/daughter – defined as one (1) housing unit, when they
sell they have to sell as mother/daughter, deed restricted.
The Board agreed that the amendments look reasonable. They clarify certain
issues and they make it easier for the issuance of building permits with
the applicants having to request use variances.
BRUCE MORSE
A site walk was scheduled for April 12th immediately after the Old Clove
walk.
DISCUSSION
The issue of signage was discussed as far as dealing with enforcement
of the sign ordinance as far as billboards, bus stops, and vehicle advertisement.
ADJOURNMENT
On a motion duly made, seconded and carried, the meeting was adjourned
at 9:30 p.m.